Budgeting for power consumption in a chassis environment that includes a plurality of integrated technology elements

ABSTRACT

Methods, apparatuses, and products for budgeting for power consumption in a chassis environment that includes a plurality of integrated technology elements (‘ITEs’), each ITE having power utilization information indicating an average power consumption of the ITE, including: determining, by a chassis management module, a total power requirement value based on a sum of the average power consumption for each ITE; increasing, by the chassis management module, the total power requirement value in dependence upon a predetermined power utilization delta; identifying, by the chassis management module, one or more power supplies to provide power to the ITEs in the chassis environment in dependence upon power delivery capabilities of the one or more power supplies and the total power requirement value; and powering on the identified one or more power supplies by the chassis management module.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 14/834,900, filed Aug. 25, 2015, which claimspriority to U.S. Pat. No. 9,454,200, issued Sep. 27, 2016.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The field of the invention is data processing, or, more specifically,methods, apparatus, and products for budgeting for power consumption ina chassis environment that includes a plurality of integrated technologyelements (‘ITEs’).

Description of Related Art

Modern computing systems can include a plurality of blade servers andother computing devices mounted within a blade center. Such a bladecenter may include a management module that is responsible for carryingout various administrative tasks. One example of an administrative taskperformed by the management module is managing the distribution of powerto power consuming components within the blade center. Each powerconsuming component within the blade center may be characterized by amaximum power utilization value representing the maximum amount of powerthat the power consuming component can utilize, typically when the powerconsuming component is operating at full capacity. In order to managethe distribution of power to the power consuming components within theblade center, the management module may allocate enough power producingresources, such as power supplies, to provide for sufficient power tothe power consuming components in the event that each power consumingcomponent is consuming power at a rate that is equal to its maximumpower utilization value. Because each power consuming component is notalways consuming power at a rate that is equal to its maximum powerutilization value, this power management approach can result in anover-allocation of power producing resources that does not take intoaccount the actual power consumption of the power consuming resources.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Methods, apparatuses, and products for budgeting for power consumptionin a chassis environment that includes a plurality of ITEs, each ITEhaving power utilization information indicating an average powerconsumption of the ITE, including: determining, by a chassis managementmodule, a total power requirement value based on a sum of the averagepower consumption for each ITE; increasing, by the chassis managementmodule, the total power requirement value in dependence upon apredetermined power utilization delta; identifying, by the chassismanagement module, one or more power supplies to provide power to theITEs in the chassis environment in dependence upon power deliverycapabilities of the one or more power supplies and the total powerrequirement value; and powering on the identified one or more powersupplies by the chassis management module.

The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of theinvention will be apparent from the following more particulardescriptions of example embodiments of the invention as illustrated inthe accompanying drawings wherein like reference numbers generallyrepresent like parts of example embodiments of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 sets forth a diagram of an example data processing system capableof budgeting for power consumption in a chassis environment thatincludes a plurality of ITEs according to embodiments of the presentinvention.

FIG. 2 sets forth a block diagram of automated computing machinerycomprising an example computer useful in budgeting for power consumptionin a chassis environment that includes a plurality of ITEs according toembodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 3 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an example method forbudgeting for power consumption in a chassis environment that includes aplurality of ITEs according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 4 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional example methodfor budgeting for power consumption in a chassis environment thatincludes a plurality of ITEs according to embodiments of the presentinvention.

FIG. 5 sets forth a flow chart illustrating an additional example methodfor budgeting for power consumption in a chassis environment thatincludes a plurality of ITEs according to embodiments of the presentinvention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Example methods, apparatuses, and products for budgeting for powerconsumption in a chassis environment that includes a plurality of ITEsin accordance with the present invention are described with reference tothe accompanying drawings, beginning with FIG. 1. FIG. 1 sets forth adiagram of an example data processing system capable of budgeting forpower consumption in a chassis environment that includes a plurality ofITEs according to embodiments of the present invention. Each ITErepresents a computing component such as a blade server, storage device,blower, or other power consuming computing component.

The data processing system of FIG. 1 includes a chassis environment(102). A ‘chassis environment,’ as the term is used in thisspecification, refers generally to a blade server system. The bladeserver system in the example depicted in FIG. 1 is installed in atwo-bay chassis (104, 106) and including one or more of blade servers(124), one or more chassis management modules (152), one or more mediatrays (122), and one or more blade server system power supplies (132).The chassis environment (102) of FIG. 1 therefore includes a pluralityof ITEs, illustrated in this example as blade servers (124), the chassismanagement module (152), and the media tray (122), although readers willappreciate that in other embodiments the ITEs may include any powerconsuming computing component of the chassis environment (102).

The chassis management module (152) of FIG. 1 may be embodied as acomputer, including software and hardware components, one or morecomputer processors and computer memory, that provides system managementfunctions for components in the example chassis environment (102),including the blade servers (124) and the media tray (122). The chassismanagement module (152) of FIG. 1 may also make available connectionsfor user input devices such as mice or keyboards (181) that are notgenerally connected directly to the blade servers (124) or to thechassis itself.

The chassis environment (102) of FIG. 1 also includes one or more bladeservers (124). The one or more blade servers (124) of FIG. 1 areinstalled in cabinet bay (104) of the example chassis environment (102).Such blade servers (124) are computing devices implemented in blade formfactor. The blade servers (124) may share access to the media tray (122)and may be connected to one another and to the chassis management module(152) for data communications through a local area network (‘LAN’)(101), which may be embodied as a small network installed within thechassis environment.

The chassis environment (102) of FIG. 1 also includes one or more mediatrays (122). The one or more media trays (122) in FIG. 1 may housenon-volatile memory media generally. A media tray (122) may typicallyinclude Compact Disc read-only media drives (‘CD-ROM’), Digital VideoDisc ROM drives (DVD-ROM), CD-RW drives, DVD-RW drives, floppy diskdrives, and so on as will occur those of skill in the art.

The arrangement of the chassis environment (102), network (101), andother devices making up the example system illustrated in FIG. 1 are forexplanation, not for limitation. Data processing systems usefulaccording to various embodiments of the present invention may includeadditional servers, routers, and other devices, not shown in FIG. 1, aswill occur to those of skill in the art. Networks in such dataprocessing systems may support many data communications protocols,including Transmission Control Protocol (‘TCP’), Internet Protocol(‘IP’), HyperText Transfer Protocol (‘HTTP’), Wireless Access Protocol(‘WAP’), Handheld Device Transport Protocol (‘HDTP’), and others as willoccur to those of skill in the art. Various embodiments of the presentinvention may be implemented on a variety of hardware platforms inaddition to those illustrated in FIG. 1.

For further explanation, FIG. 2 sets forth a block diagram of automatedcomputing machinery comprising an example computer (252) useful inbudgeting for power consumption in a chassis environment (302) thatincludes a plurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314) according to embodiments ofthe present invention. The chassis environment (302) of FIG. 2 may beembodied, for example, as a blade server system that includes aplurality of blade servers, one or more media trays, one or more powersupplies (304, 306, 308), and so on. In such an example, each ITE (310,312, 314) may be embodied, for example, as a blade server, blower,network switch, storage device, or other power consuming componentmounted within the chassis environment (302).

The computer (252) of FIG. 2 includes at least one computer processor(256) or ‘CPU’ as well as random access memory (‘RAM’) (268) which isconnected through a high speed memory bus (266) and bus adapter (258) toprocessor (256) and to other components of the computer (252). Stored inRAM (268) is a chassis management module (330), a module of computerprogram instructions for budgeting for power consumption in a chassisenvironment (302) that includes a plurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314)according to embodiments of the present invention.

The chassis management module (330) may be configured to budget forpower consumption in a chassis environment (302) that includes aplurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314) by determining a total powerrequirement value based on the sum of the average power consumption foreach ITE (310, 312, 314). The total power requirement value representsthe total amount of power being used by all of the ITEs (310, 312, 314)in the chassis environment (302), based on the average power consumptionof each ITE (310, 312, 314) in the chassis environment (302).Determining the total power requirement value may be carried out by thechassis management module (330) receiving, from each ITE (310, 312,314), the average power consumption for each ITE (310, 312, 314) in thechassis environment (302). In such an example, determining the totalpower requirement value may subsequently include summing the averagepower consumption for each ITE (310, 312, 314) in the chassisenvironment (302).

The chassis management module (330) may be further configured to budgetfor power consumption in a chassis environment (302) that includes aplurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314) by increasing the total powerrequirement value in dependence upon a predetermined power utilizationdelta. The predetermined power utilization delta represents an amount ofadditional power that can be allocated for use by the ITEs (310, 312,314), such that an increase in the actual amount of power consumed bythe ITEs (310, 312, 314) does not cause the actual amount of powerconsumed by the ITEs (310, 312, 314) to exceed the amount of powerallocated for use by the ITEs (310, 312, 314).

Consider an example in which a first ITE (310) has an average powerconsumption of 600 Watts, a second ITE (312) has an average powerconsumption of 500 Watts, and a third ITE (314) has an average powerconsumption of 800 Watts. In such an example, the total powerrequirement value may be determined to be 1900 Watts. In the event thatone or more of the ITEs (310, 312, 314) begins consuming additionalpower, however, the ITEs (310, 312, 314) will require more than 1900Watts of total power to continue normal operations. In order to ensurethat an increased demand for power can be met, the chassis managementmodule (330) may allocate additional power resources so as to providefor more than the 1900 Watts of power presently needed. This additionalallocation of power can be specified by the system power utilizationdelta, whose value may be determined based on many factors such as thetime required to turn on an additional power supply, the number of ITEs(310, 312, 314) currently drawing power, and so on.

The chassis management module (330) may be further configured to budgetfor power consumption in a chassis environment (302) that includes aplurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314) by identifying one or more powersupplies (304, 306, 308) to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) inthe chassis environment (302). The chassis management module (330) mayidentify one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) to provide power tothe ITEs (310, 312, 314) in dependence upon power delivery capabilitiesof the one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) and the total powerrequirement value. The power delivery capabilities of the one or morepower supplies (304, 306, 308) may include, for example, the totalamount of power that each of the power supplies (304, 306, 308) candeliver to one or more ITEs (310, 312, 314).

Consider the example described above in which the first ITE (310) has anaverage power consumption of 600 Watts, a second ITE (312) has anaverage power consumption of 500 Watts, and a third ITE (314) has anaverage power consumption of 800 Watts, such that the total powerrequirement value may be determined to be 1900 Watts. Assume in such anexample that the system power utilization delta is set to a value of 300Watts, such that the total power requirement value is increased to avalue of 2200 Watts. Further assume that the power delivery capabilitiesof the one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) are such that each ofthe power supplies in capable of delivering 1200 Watts of power. In suchan example, identifying one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) toprovide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) in dependence upon powerdelivery capabilities of the one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308)and the total power requirement value may therefore include selectingany two of the three available power supplies (304, 306, 308) to providepower to the ITEs (310, 312, 314), as any combination of the two powersupplies (304, 306, 308) can deliver the 2200 Watts representing thetotal power requirement value. In an alternative embodiment where twopower supplies (304, 306) are each capable of delivering 1200 Watts ofpower while the third power supply (308) is only capable of delivering800 Watts of power, the two power supplies (304, 306) that are eachcapable of delivering 1200 Watts of power may be identified as the oneor more power supplies (304, 306) to provide power to the ITEs (310,312, 314) in the chassis environment (302).

The chassis management module (330) may be further configured to budgetfor power consumption in a chassis environment (302) that includes aplurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314) by powering on the identified one ormore power supplies (304, 306, 308). Powering on the identified one ormore power supplies (304, 306, 308) may be carried out, for example, bythe chassis management module (330) sending a control signal over acontrol line such as a power management bus between each of the powersupplies (304, 306, 308) and the chassis management module (330). Insuch a way, the chassis management module (330) may be configured tosend an ‘On’ signal or an ‘Off’ signal to each of the power supplies(304, 306, 308) such that power is delivered to one or more of the ITEs(310, 312, 314) from the one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) overa power line (291).

Also stored in RAM (268) of the computer (252) is an operating system(254). Operating systems useful budgeting for power consumption in achassis environment (302) that includes a plurality of ITEs (310, 312,314) according to embodiments of the present invention include UNIX™,Linux™, Microsoft XP™, AIX™, IBM's i5/OS™, and others as will occur tothose of skill in the art. The operating system (254) and the chassismanagement module (330) in the example of FIG. 2 are shown in RAM (268),but many components of such software typically are stored innon-volatile memory also, such as, for example, on a disk drive (270).

The computer (252) of FIG. 2 includes disk drive adapter (272) coupledthrough expansion bus (260) and bus adapter (258) to processor (256) andother components of the computer (252). Disk drive adapter (272)connects non-volatile data storage to the computer (252) in the form ofdisk drive (270). Disk drive adapters useful in computers for budgetingfor power consumption in a chassis environment (302) that includes aplurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314) according to embodiments of thepresent invention include Integrated Drive Electronics (‘IDE’) adapters,Small Computer System Interface (‘SCSI’) adapters, and others as willoccur to those of skill in the art. Non-volatile computer memory alsomay be implemented for as an optical disk drive, electrically erasableprogrammable read-only memory (so-called ‘EEPROM’ or ‘Flash’ memory),RAM drives, and so on, as will occur to those of skill in the art.

The example computer (252) of FIG. 2 includes one or more input/output(‘I/O’) adapters (278). I/O adapters implement user-orientedinput/output through, for example, software drivers and computerhardware for controlling output to display devices such as computerdisplay screens, as well as user input from user input devices (281)such as keyboards and mice. The example computer (252) of FIG. 2includes a video adapter (209), which is an example of an I/O adapterspecially designed for graphic output to a display device (280) such asa display screen or computer monitor. Video adapter (209) is connectedto processor (256) through a high speed video bus (264), bus adapter(258), and the front side bus (262), which is also a high speed bus.

The example computer (252) of FIG. 2 includes a communications adapter(267) for data communications with other computers such as the ITEs(310, 312, 314) and for data communications with a data communicationsnetwork (200). Such data communications may be carried out seriallythrough RS-232 connections, through external buses such as a UniversalSerial Bus (‘USB’), through data communications networks such as IP datacommunications networks, and in other ways as will occur to those ofskill in the art. Communications adapters implement the hardware levelof data communications through which one computer sends datacommunications to another computer, directly or through a datacommunications network. Examples of communications adapters useful forbudgeting for power consumption in a chassis environment (302) thatincludes a plurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314) according to embodiments ofthe present invention include modems for wired dial-up communications,Ethernet (IEEE 802.3) adapters for wired data communications networkcommunications, and 802.11 adapters for wireless data communicationsnetwork communications.

For further explanation, FIG. 3 sets forth a flow chart illustrating anexample method for budgeting for power consumption in a chassisenvironment (302) that includes a plurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314)according to embodiments of the present invention. The chassisenvironment (302) of FIG. 3 may be embodied, for example, as a bladeserver system that includes a plurality of blade servers, one or moremedia trays, one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308), and so on. Insuch an example, each ITE (310, 312, 314) may be embodied, for example,as a blade server, blower, network switch, storage device, or otherpower consuming component mounted within the chassis environment (302).

The chassis environment (302) depicted in FIG. 3 includes a chassismanagement module (330). The chassis management module (330) may beembodied, for example, as a module of computer program instructionsexecuting on computer hardware such as a computer processor. Forexample, the chassis management module (330) may be embodied as acomputer, including software and hardware components, one or morecomputer processors, and computer memory, that provides systemmanagement functions for all components in the example chassisenvironment (302). The chassis management module (330) may also makeavailable connections for user input devices such as mice or keyboardsthat are not generally connected directly to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) orto the chassis environment (302).

The chassis environment (302) of FIG. 3 includes a plurality of ITEs(310, 312, 314). In the example method depicted in FIG. 3, each ITE(310, 312, 314) has power utilization information indicating an averagepower consumption (315, 316, 317) of the ITE (310, 312, 314). Theaverage power consumption (315, 316, 317) of the ITE (310, 312, 314) maybe measured, for example, over a predetermined period of time. In suchan example, the period of time may be short enough and recent enoughsuch that the average power consumption (315, 316, 317) isrepresentative of the current power usage of a particular ITE (310, 312,314). The average power consumption (315, 316, 317) of a particular ITE(310, 312, 314) may be expressed in absolute terms such as the number ofWatts consumed by a particular ITE (310, 312, 314), or in relative termssuch as the percentage of the maximum power consumption associated witha particular ITE (310, 312, 314). In the example depicted in FIG. 3,each ITE (310, 312, 314) may send a message containing its average powerconsumption (315, 316, 317) to the chassis management module (330), thechassis management module (330) may periodically poll each ITE (310,312, 314) for its average power consumption (315, 316, 317), and so on.

The example method depicted in FIG. 3 includes determining (318), by thechassis management module (330), a total power requirement value (320)based on the sum of the average power consumption (315, 316, 317) foreach ITE (310, 312, 314). The total power requirement value (320)represents the total amount of power being used by all of the ITEs (310,312, 314) in the chassis environment (302), based on the average powerconsumption of each ITE (310, 312, 314) in the chassis environment(302). Determining (318) the total power requirement value (320) may becarried out by the chassis management module (330) summing the averagepower consumption (315, 316, 317) for each ITE (310, 312, 314) in thechassis environment (302).

The example method depicted in FIG. 3 also includes increasing (324), bythe chassis management module (330), the total power requirement value(320) in dependence upon a predetermined power utilization delta (322).The predetermined power utilization delta (322) represents an amount ofadditional power that can be allocated for use by the ITEs (310, 312,314), such that an increase in the actual amount of power consumed bythe ITEs (310, 312, 314) does not cause the actual amount of powerconsumed by the ITEs (310, 312, 314) to exceed the amount of powerallocated for use by the ITEs (310, 312, 314).

Consider an example in which a first ITE (310) has an average powerconsumption (315) of 600 Watts, a second ITE (312) has an average powerconsumption (316) of 500 Watts, and a third ITE (314) has an averagepower consumption (317) of 800 Watts. In such an example, the totalpower requirement value (320) may be determined (318) to be 1900 Watts.In the event that one or more of the ITEs (310, 312, 314) beginsconsuming additional power, however, the ITEs (310, 312, 314) willrequire more than 1900 Watts of total power to continue normaloperations. In order to ensure that an increased demand for power can bemet, the chassis management module (330) may allocate additional powerresources so as to provide for more than the 1900 Watts of powerpresently needed. This additional allocation of power can be specifiedby the system power utilization delta (322), whose value may bedetermined based on many factors such as the time required to turn on anadditional power supply, the number of ITEs (310, 312, 314) currentlydrawing power, and so on.

Consider an example in which additional power supplies can be turned onin 1 minute in a first system, while turning on additional powersupplies in a second system only takes 1 second. In such an example, thesystem power utilization delta (322) of the second system may be set toa value that is lower than the system power utilization delta (322) ofthe first system, as an increase in the amount of power needed can bemet more quickly in the second system relative to the first system.Stated differently, the system power utilization delta (322) may be setto a high value in the first system so as to satisfy a greaterfluctuation in the amount of power available to the ITEs in the firstsystem without needing to turn on an additional power supply.

The example method depicted in FIG. 3 also includes identifying (326),by the chassis management module (330), one or more power supplies (304,306, 308) to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) in the chassisenvironment (302). In the example method depicted in FIG. 3, the chassismanagement module (330) may identify (326) one or more power supplies(304, 306, 308) to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) independence upon power delivery capabilities of the one or more powersupplies (304, 306, 308) and the total power requirement value (320).The power delivery capabilities of the one or more power supplies (304,306, 308) may include, for example, the total amount of power that eachof the power supplies (304, 306, 308) can deliver to one or more ITEs(310, 312, 314).

Consider the example described above in which the first ITE (310) has anaverage power consumption (315) of 600 Watts, a second ITE (312) has anaverage power consumption (316) of 500 Watts, and a third ITE (314) hasan average power consumption (317) of 800 Watts, such that the totalpower requirement value (320) may be determined (318) to be 1900 Watts.Assume in such an example that the system power utilization delta (322)is set to a value of 300 Watts, such that the total power requirementvalue (320) is increased (324) to a value of 2200 Watts. Further assumethat the power delivery capabilities of the one or more power supplies(304, 306, 308) are such that each of the power supplies in capable ofdelivering 1200 Watts of power. In such an example, identifying (326)one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) to provide power to the ITEs(310, 312, 314) in dependence upon power delivery capabilities of theone or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) and the total powerrequirement value (320) may therefore include selecting any two of thethree available power supplies (304, 306, 308) to provide power to theITEs (310, 312, 314), as any combination of the two power supplies (304,306, 308) can deliver the 2200 Watts representing the total powerrequirement value (320). In an alternative embodiment where two powersupplies (304, 306) are each capable of delivering 1200 Watts of powerwhile the third power supply (308) is only capable of delivering 800Watts of power, the two power supplies (304, 306) that are each capableof delivering 1200 Watts of power may be identified (326) as the one ormore power supplies (304, 306) to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312,314) in the chassis environment (302).

The example method depicted in FIG. 3 also includes powering (328) onthe identified one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) by the chassismanagement module (330). Powering (328) on the identified one or morepower supplies (304, 306, 308) may be carried out, for example, by thechassis management module (330) sending a control signal over a controlline such as a power management bus between each of the power supplies(304, 306, 308) and the chassis management module (330). In such a way,the chassis management module (330) may be configured to send an ‘On’signal or an ‘Off’ signal to each of the power supplies (304, 306, 308).

For further explanation, FIG. 4 sets forth a flow chart illustrating anadditional example method for budgeting for power consumption in achassis environment that includes a plurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314)according to embodiments of the present invention. The example methoddepicted in FIG. 4 is similar to the example method depicted in FIG. 3,as it also includes determining (318) a total power requirement value(320) based on the sum of the average power consumption (315, 316, 317)for each ITE (310, 312, 314), increasing (324) the total powerrequirement value (320) in dependence upon a predetermined powerutilization delta (322), identifying (326) one or more power supplies(304, 306, 308) to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) in thechassis environment (302) in dependence upon power delivery capabilitiesof the one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) and the total powerrequirement value (320), and powering (328) on the identified one ormore power supplies (304, 306, 308) by the chassis management module(330).

The example method depicted in FIG. 4 also includes determining (402),by the chassis management module (330), a system power utilization delta(322) in dependence upon system configuration information describing oneor more components in the chassis environment (302). The systemconfiguration information describing one or more components in thechassis environment (302) can include, for example, the number of ITEs(310, 312, 314) in the chassis environment (302), the maximum possiblepower that can be consumed by each of the ITEs (310, 312, 314) in thechassis environment (302), the amount of time required to power on anadditional power supply (304, 306, 308), or any other information usefulin determining how much additional power to allocate for use by the ITEs(310, 312, 314) beyond the sum of the average power consumption (315,316, 317) for the ITEs (310, 312, 314).

Consider an example in which a first system includes only one activeITE, which is consuming an average of 300 Watts of power and is onlycapable of consuming 400 Watts of power when the one active ITE is fullyutilized. In such an example, a system power utilization delta (322)would need to be no more than 100 Watts as the power consumption of theone active ITE could only possibly increase by 100 Watts. Alternatively,in a second system that includes one thousand active ITEs, which arecumulatively consuming an average of 300 kiloWatts and are cumulativelycapable of consuming up to 400 kiloWatts when each of the one thousandactive ITEs are fully utilized, a system power utilization delta (322)of 100 Watts may be insufficient as the cumulative actual powerconsumption of the one thousand active ITEs could easily increase morethan 100 Watts.

In the example method depicted in FIG. 4, determining (402) a systempower utilization delta (322) in dependence upon system configurationinformation describing one or more components in the chassis environment(302) may be carried out through the use of a predetermined formula thattakes into account many system configuration factors. Such a formulamay, for example, increase the system power utilization delta (322) asthe number of ITEs in the chassis environment (302) increases, decreasethe system power utilization delta (322) as the number of ITEs in thechassis environment (302) decreases, increase or decrease the systempower utilization delta (322) in dependence upon how slowly or quicklyone or more power supplies in the chassis environment (302) can bepowered on, decrease the system power utilization delta (322) as thecumulative amount of power consumed by each ITE in the chassisenvironment (302) approaches the cumulative maximum of power that canpossibly be consumed by each ITE in the chassis environment (302),increase the system power utilization delta (322) as the cumulativeamount of power consumed by each ITE in the chassis environment (302)gets further below the cumulative maximum of power that can possibly beconsumed by each ITE in the chassis environment (302), and so on. Insuch a way, the system power utilization delta (322) may change overtime as characteristics of the chassis environment (302) change and asthe power consumption of the ITEs with the chassis environment (302)change.

The example method depicted in FIG. 4 also includes powering (404) offeach of the power supplies (304, 306, 308) that were not identified(326) to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) in the chassisenvironment (302). Powering (404) off the identified one or more powersupplies (304, 306, 308) may be carried out, for example, by the chassismanagement module (330) sending a control signal over a control linesuch as a power management bus between each of the power supplies (304,306, 308) and the chassis management module (330). In such a way, thechassis management module (330) may be configured to send an ‘On’ signalor an ‘Off’ signal to each of the power supplies (304, 306, 308).

For further explanation, FIG. 5 sets forth a flow chart illustrating anadditional example method for budgeting for power consumption in achassis environment that includes a plurality of ITEs (310, 312, 314)according to embodiments of the present invention. The example methoddepicted in FIG. 5 is similar to the example method depicted in FIG. 3,as it also includes determining (318) a total power requirement value(320) based on the sum of the average power consumption (315, 316, 317)for each ITE (310, 312, 314), increasing (324) the total powerrequirement value (320) in dependence upon a predetermined powerutilization delta (322), identifying (326) one or more power supplies(304, 306, 308) to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) in thechassis environment (302) in dependence upon power delivery capabilitiesof the one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) and the total powerrequirement value (320), and powering (328) on the identified one ormore power supplies (304, 306, 308) by the chassis management module(330).

In the example method depicted in FIG. 5, each of the power supplies(304, 306, 308) can have an identical power delivery rating. In theexample method depicted in FIG. 5, the power delivery rating representsthe amount of power that a particular power supply (304, 306, 308) candeliver to one or more of the ITEs (310, 312, 314). In such an example,identifying (326) one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) to providepower to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) can therefore include identifying(502) a number of active power supplies needed to provide power to theITEs (310, 312, 314). Identifying (502) a number of active powersupplies needed to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) may becarried out, for example, by dividing the total power requirement value(320) by the power delivery rating of each power supply (304, 306, 308)and rounding up to a whole number.

Consider an example in which the total power requirement value (320) is2200 Watts and each power supply (304, 306, 308) has a power deliveryrating indicating that each power supply (304, 306, 308) can deliver1200 Watts to the ITEs (310, 312, 314). In such an example, the numberof active power supplies needed to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312,314) is equal to the rounded up value of 2200 Watts divided by 1200Watts, indicating that the number of active power supplies needed toprovide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) is two power supplies.

The example method depicted in FIG. 5 also includes powering (504) onone or more additional power supplies (304, 306, 308) in dependence upona predetermined power mode. In the example method depicted in FIG. 5,the predetermined power mode is a predetermined policy that identifiesthe number of power supplies (304, 306, 308) to be powered on in excessof the actual number of power supplies (304, 306, 308) needed to anamount of power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) that meets the total powerrequirement value (320). Such a predetermined power mode may beembodied, for example, as an ‘N+1’ power mode where one power supply inexcess of the actual number of power supplies (304, 306, 308) needed toprovide an amount of power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) that meets thetotal power requirement value (320) is powered on. Alternatively, thepredetermined power mode may be embodied as a ‘N+N’ power mode wheretwice the number of power supplies (304, 306, 308) that are needed toprovide an amount of power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314) that meets thetotal power requirement value (320) are powered on. In such an example,the predetermined power mode may be set by a system administrator orother administrative entity.

The example method depicted in FIG. 5 also includes rotating (506), bythe chassis management module (302), which power supplies (304, 306,308) are identified (326) to provide power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314)in the chassis environment (302) in dependence upon a power supplymanagement policy. In the example method depicted in FIG. 5, a powersupply management policy represents a rule set for selecting which powersupplies (304, 306, 308) are to be utilized for providing power to theITEs (310, 312, 314) in the chassis environment (302). The power supplymanagement policy may be designed such that different power supplies(304, 306, 308) are routinely utilized in order to maintain theoperational health of the one or more power supplies (304, 306, 308) andto routinely check the operational health of the one or more powersupplies (304, 306, 308). The power supply management policy mayspecify, for example, the maximum length of time that a particular powersupply (304, 306, 308) may be active, the maximum length of time that aparticular power supply (304, 306, 308) may be inactive, an algorithmthat defines the order in which the power supplies are to be utilized,and so on.

Consider an example in which the total power requirement value (320) is2200 Watts and each power supply (304, 306, 308) has a power deliveryrating indicating that each power supply (304, 306, 308) can deliver1200 Watts of power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314), such that two powersupplies are sufficient for providing power to the ITEs (310, 312, 314).In such an example, if the same two power supplies (304, 306) alwaysremain active while the remaining power supply (308) always remainsinactive, the two active power supplies (304, 306) may wear outprematurely while the inactive power supply (308) may become stale andrequire an increased amount of time to power up. As such, a power supplymanagement policy that limits the amount of time that a particular powersupply (304, 306, 308) can remain active or inactive can result in eachof the power supplies (304, 306, 308) being powered on for similaramounts of time, preventing premature wear on any of the power supplies(304, 306, 308). Readers will appreciate that in order to maintain andmonitor the health of each power supply (304, 306, 308), the powersupply management policy may specify an algorithm (e.g., round robin,least recently used, most recently used) to be used when determining anorder in which power supplies are to be powered off and which powersupplies are to be powered on as part of rotating (506) which powersupplies (304, 306, 308) are identified (326) to provide power to theITEs (310, 312, 314) in the chassis environment (302).

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product. The computer program product may include a computerreadable storage medium (or media) having computer readable programinstructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of thepresent invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, andconventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computeror entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example,programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), orprogrammable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readableprogram instructions by utilizing state information of the computerreadable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry,in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that the computerreadable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises anarticle of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects ofthe function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram blockor blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of theorder noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

It will be understood from the foregoing description that modificationsand changes may be made in various embodiments of the present inventionwithout departing from its true spirit. The descriptions in thisspecification are for purposes of illustration only and are not to beconstrued in a limiting sense. The scope of the present invention islimited only by the language of the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of budgeting for power consumption in achassis environment that includes a plurality of integrated technologyelements (‘ITEs’), each ITE having power utilization informationindicating an average power consumption of the ITE, the methodcomprising: determining, by a chassis management module, a total powerrequirement value based on a sum of the average power consumption foreach ITE; determining, by the chassis management module, a system powerutilization delta in dependence upon system configuration informationdescribing one or more components in the chassis environment includingan amount of time required to power on an additional power supply,wherein the system power utilization delta represents an amount ofadditional power that can be allocated for use by the ITEs; increasing,by the chassis management module, the total power requirement value independence upon the system power utilization delta; identifying, by thechassis management module, one or more power supplies to provide powerto the ITEs in the chassis environment in dependence upon power deliverycapabilities of the one or more power supplies and the increased totalpower requirement value.
 2. The method of claim 1 further comprisingpowering off each of the power supplies that were not identified toprovide power to the ITEs in the chassis environment.
 3. The method ofclaim 1 further comprising rotating, by the chassis management module,which power supplies are identified to provide power to the ITEs in thechassis environment in dependence upon a power supply management policy.4. The method of claim 1 wherein each of the power supplies has anidentical power delivery rating and identifying the one or more powersupplies to provide power to the ITEs in the chassis environment furthercomprises identifying a number of active power supplies in dependencethe power delivery rating and the total power requirement value.
 5. Themethod of claim 1 further comprising powering on one or more additionalpower supplies in dependence upon a predetermined power mode.
 6. Anapparatus for budgeting for power consumption in a chassis environmentthat includes a plurality of integrated technology elements (‘ITEs’),each ITE having power utilization information indicating an averagepower consumption of the ITE, the apparatus comprising a computerprocessor, a computer memory operatively coupled to the computerprocessor, the computer memory having disposed within it computerprogram instructions that, when executed by the computer processor,cause the apparatus to carry out the steps of: determining, by a chassismanagement module, a total power requirement value based on a sum of theaverage power consumption for each ITE; determining, by the chassismanagement module, a system power utilization delta in dependence uponsystem configuration information describing one or more components inthe chassis environment including an amount of time required to power onan additional power supply, wherein the system power utilization deltarepresents an amount of additional power that can be allocated for useby the ITEs; increasing, by the chassis management module, the totalpower requirement value in dependence upon the system power utilizationdelta; identifying, by the chassis management module, one or more powersupplies to provide power to the ITEs in the chassis environment independence upon power delivery capabilities of the one or more powersupplies and the increased total power requirement value.
 7. Theapparatus of claim 6 further comprising computer program instructionsthat, when executed by the computer processor, cause the apparatus tocarry out the step of powering off each of the power supplies that werenot identified to provide power to the ITEs in the chassis environment.8. The apparatus of claim 6 further comprising computer programinstructions that, when executed by the computer processor, cause theapparatus to carry out the step of rotating, by the chassis managementmodule, which power supplies are identified to provide power to the ITEsin the chassis environment in dependence upon a power supply managementpolicy.
 9. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein each of the power supplieshas an identical power delivery rating and identifying the one or morepower supplies to provide power to the ITEs in the chassis environmentfurther comprises identifying a number of active power supplies independence the power delivery rating and the total power requirementvalue.
 10. The apparatus of claim 6 further comprising computer programinstructions that, when executed by the computer processor, cause theapparatus to carry out the step of powering on one or more additionalpower supplies in dependence upon a predetermined power mode.
 11. Acomputer program product for budgeting for power consumption in achassis environment that includes a plurality of integrated technologyelements (‘ITEs’), each ITE having power utilization informationindicating an average power consumption of the ITE, the computer programproduct disposed upon a computer readable medium, wherein the computerreadable medium is not a signal, the computer program product comprisingcomputer program instructions that, when executed, cause a computer tocarry out the steps of: determining, by a chassis management module, atotal power requirement value based on a sum of the average powerconsumption for each ITE; determining, by the chassis management module,a system power utilization delta in dependence upon system configurationinformation describing one or more components in the chassis environmentincluding an amount of time required to power on an additional powersupply, wherein the system power utilization delta represents an amountof additional power that can be allocated for use by the ITEs;increasing, by the chassis management module, the total powerrequirement value in dependence upon the system power utilization delta;identifying, by the chassis management module, one or more powersupplies to provide power to the ITEs in the chassis environment independence upon power delivery capabilities of the one or more powersupplies and the increased total power requirement value.
 12. Thecomputer program product of claim 11 further comprising computer programinstructions that, when executed, cause the computer to carry out thestep of powering off each of the power supplies that were not identifiedto provide power to the ITEs in the chassis environment.
 13. Thecomputer program product of claim 11 further comprising computer programinstructions that, when executed, cause the computer to carry out thestep of rotating, by the chassis management module, which power suppliesare identified to provide power to the ITEs in the chassis environmentin dependence upon a power supply management policy.
 14. The computerprogram product of claim 11 wherein each of the power supplies has anidentical power delivery rating and identifying the one or more powersupplies to provide power to the ITEs in the chassis environment furthercomprises identifying a number of active power supplies in dependencethe power delivery rating and the total power requirement value.
 15. Thecomputer program product of claim 11 further comprising computer programinstructions that, when executed, cause the computer to carry out thestep of powering on one or more additional power supplies in dependenceupon a predetermined power mode.